7 Metal vs Asphalt Roofing Facts That Remote Property Owners Must Know

Choosing the right roofing material for your remote property involves more than just aesthetic considerations—it’s a decision that impacts your home’s longevity, maintenance requirements, and overall value.

Metal and asphalt represent two distinctly different roofing solutions, each with unique advantages and challenges when installed in isolated locations with limited access to contractors and services.

Before making your investment, you’ll need to weigh factors like initial costs against long-term durability, extreme weather resistance, maintenance demands, environmental impact, and installation complexity—all of which take on added significance when your property is miles from the nearest town.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, this site earns from qualifying purchases. Thank you!

Durability and Weather Resistance: How Metal Outperforms Asphalt in Remote Locations

Extreme Temperature Tolerance

Metal roofing excels in extreme temperature environments where remote properties often exist. Unlike asphalt shingles that can crack at -20°F or deteriorate when temperatures exceed 180°F, metal roofs maintain structural integrity from -60°F to 350°F. This superior tolerance means you’ll face fewer emergency repairs during severe weather events when contractors are unavailable for days or even weeks.

Impact Resistance Against Falling Debris

Remote properties typically face greater exposure to falling branches and debris without regular tree maintenance. While asphalt shingles easily puncture or lose granules from impacts, quality metal roofing withstands debris strikes without compromising waterproofing. Most metal roofing systems carry Class 4 impact ratings—the highest available—ensuring your roof remains intact even when professional repairs aren’t immediately accessible.

Snow and Wind Load Capacity

Metal roofing significantly outperforms asphalt in regions with heavy snow or high winds common to remote areas. Quality metal roofs withstand wind speeds up to 140 mph compared to asphalt’s typical 60-90 mph rating. The slick surface of metal also sheds snow efficiently, preventing dangerous accumulation and reducing structural stress during winter months when accessing your property for maintenance may be challenging or impossible.

Installation and Maintenance Requirements: What Remote Property Owners Need to Know

When you’re miles from the nearest town, your roofing decisions take on added significance. The installation process and ongoing maintenance requirements dramatically differ between metal and asphalt options for remote properties.

Accessibility Challenges for Roofing Contractors

Remote properties often face significant contractor availability issues. Professional roofers may charge premium rates for distant locations, sometimes adding 25-50% to standard installation costs. Metal roofing typically requires specialized installers with specific tools and expertise, while asphalt shingle installation draws from a larger contractor pool. Plan installations during optimal weather seasons to avoid scheduling complications when access roads may be compromised.

Frequency of Required Maintenance

Metal roofs demand minimal maintenance with inspections recommended every 2-3 years. You’ll primarily need to clear debris and check fasteners—tasks that can often be scheduled during other property visits. Asphalt roofs require more frequent attention with annual inspections and potential shingle replacements every 5-7 years. This maintenance differential becomes crucial when every contractor visit involves significant travel time and expense to your remote location.

DIY Repair Possibilities

Asphalt shingles offer greater DIY repair potential with simple techniques for replacing damaged sections using basic tools. You can address minor issues with roofing cement and replacement shingles even with limited experience. Metal roofing repairs often require specialized knowledge of fastening systems and proper sealing techniques. While small scratches can be addressed with touch-up paint, structural repairs typically demand professional expertise that may not be readily available in remote areas.

Longevity and Lifecycle Costs: Making the Economic Case for Remote Roofing

Initial Investment vs. Long-Term Value

Metal roofing typically costs 2-3 times more than asphalt initially ($10-14/sq ft vs. $4-6/sq ft). However, this upfront investment pays dividends for remote properties through reduced replacement costs and fewer contractor visits. Metal’s 50+ year lifespan compared to asphalt’s 15-20 years means you’ll replace an asphalt roof at least twice during a metal roof’s lifetime—a crucial consideration when contractor access is limited and transportation costs are high.

Replacement Frequency Considerations

Asphalt roofs in remote locations typically require full replacement every 15-20 years, with significant labor and material costs each time. Metal roofing systems can last 50+ years with minimal intervention, eliminating 2-3 complete replacement cycles during your property ownership. This replacement frequency difference becomes especially valuable when you factor in the inflated costs of bringing materials and crews to isolated properties—often 30-40% higher than standard rates.

Insurance Premium Implications

Metal roofs can reduce insurance premiums by 15-30% for remote properties due to their superior fire resistance and durability against extreme weather. Many insurance companies offer “fortified roof” discounts specifically for metal systems that meet high-performance standards. These savings compound annually, potentially totaling $5,000-$10,000 over the roof’s lifetime. Additionally, properties with metal roofing typically maintain higher resale values, creating further economic advantage for properties in isolated areas.

Environmental Factors: Sustainability and Fire Resistance for Isolated Properties

Wildfire Protection Capabilities

Metal roofing provides superior fire resistance for remote properties in wildfire-prone areas. With a Class A fire rating, metal roofs won’t ignite when exposed to embers, unlike asphalt shingles that contain petroleum-based materials. For isolated homesteads, this fire-resistant barrier can be critical when emergency response times exceed 30+ minutes, potentially meaning the difference between salvageable property and total loss.

Recyclability and Eco-Friendly Aspects

Metal roofing boasts impressive environmental credentials with 25-95% recycled content and 100% recyclability at end-of-life. Asphalt shingles, by contrast, contribute approximately 11 million tons to landfills annually with minimal recycling options. For eco-conscious remote property owners, metal roofing eliminates the environmental guilt of disposal, particularly important when rural disposal options are limited and hauling costs are substantial.

Energy Efficiency in Off-Grid Settings

For off-grid properties relying on solar power systems, metal roofing delivers tangible energy benefits. Reflective metal surfaces can reduce cooling costs by 10-25% by reflecting solar radiation rather than absorbing it. Many metal roofs are also compatible with rainwater collection systems, providing dual functionality critical for isolated properties. Asphalt shingles offer fewer energy-saving features and can contaminate harvested rainwater, a significant disadvantage for self-sufficient homesteads.

Transportation and Logistics: Getting Materials to Your Remote Property

Choosing between metal and asphalt roofing for your remote property ultimately depends on your specific circumstances. Metal roofing offers superior durability lasting 50+ years with minimal maintenance and excellent weather resistance but requires a higher initial investment and specialized installation. Asphalt provides affordability and easier DIY repairs but demands more frequent maintenance and replacements.

For truly remote locations where contractor visits are costly and inconvenient the long-term benefits of metal roofing often outweigh the initial cost premium. Consider your property’s exposure to extreme weather fire risk and your long-term ownership plans when making this important decision.

Whatever material you choose ensuring proper installation is crucial for maximizing your roof’s performance and lifespan in challenging remote environments.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between metal and asphalt roofing for remote properties?

Metal roofing offers superior durability (50+ years lifespan vs. asphalt’s 15-20 years), better weather resistance, and requires less maintenance. Asphalt shingles cost less initially ($4-6/sq ft vs. metal’s $10-14/sq ft) and are easier to DIY repair. For remote properties, metal’s longevity means fewer replacement cycles and contractor visits, which is valuable when professional help is difficult to access.

How do metal roofs perform in extreme weather conditions?

Metal roofs excel in extreme weather, maintaining structural integrity from -60°F to 350°F. They can withstand wind speeds up to 140 mph, carry a Class 4 impact rating against falling debris, and efficiently shed snow to prevent dangerous accumulation. These qualities make metal roofing ideal for remote properties where emergency repairs during severe weather may be difficult to arrange.

What are the maintenance requirements for metal vs. asphalt roofs in remote locations?

Metal roofs require minimal maintenance with inspections every 2-3 years. Asphalt shingles need more frequent attention, including annual inspections and potential shingle replacements every 5-7 years. While asphalt offers easier DIY repair potential with basic tools, metal roofing repairs often require professional expertise that may be scarce in remote areas.

Is the higher cost of metal roofing worth it for remote properties?

Yes, despite costing 2-3 times more initially, metal roofing provides better long-term value for remote properties. The extended lifespan means fewer replacements over time, reducing the high transportation costs for materials and labor to distant locations. Metal roofs can also lower insurance premiums by 15-30% and maintain higher resale values, saving owners $5,000-$10,000 over the roof’s lifetime.

How do these roofing options compare in terms of environmental impact?

Metal roofing is more environmentally friendly, containing 25-95% recycled content and being 100% recyclable at end-of-life. Asphalt shingles contribute significantly to landfill waste. For off-grid properties, metal roofs offer superior energy efficiency, reducing cooling costs and compatibility with rainwater collection systems, while asphalt shingles can contaminate harvested water.

What fire resistance do these roofing materials offer for isolated properties?

Metal roofing provides superior fire resistance with a Class A fire rating, making it significantly safer in wildfire-prone remote areas. Asphalt shingles offer less protection against fire spread. This difference is crucial for isolated properties that may have delayed emergency response times and limited access to firefighting resources.

How does contractor availability affect roofing choices for remote properties?

Professional roofers typically charge premium rates for distant locations. Metal roofing requires specialized installers, limiting the contractor pool, while asphalt shingles can be installed by more contractors. This availability difference can significantly impact installation timelines and costs, making contractor access an important consideration when selecting roofing materials for remote properties.